In January 2025, a fire broke out during the afternoon in one building of the Moss Landing Energy Storage Facility (Phase 1, MOSS300) in Moss Landing, Monterey County, California, United States, a large grid-scale lithium-ion battery energy storage facility...
Vistra Energy
Named in a role in 4 records, and mentioned in the text of 5 entries, between 2021 and 2026.
Being named is not a finding of fault. Counts are of records in published reporting, not rates, and the company's role is the one the sources give.
Work at Vistra Energy? See every record that names it, free, and ask for a correction or add your side.
Records naming this company
Free entries that mention Vistra Energy
PG&E began returning its Elkhorn Battery Energy Storage System at Moss Landing, California to service on 1 June 2025, following an automatic shutdown on 16 January 2025 when the system's infrared fire detection picked up flames from a fire at the neighbouring...
On 13 February 2022, an early detection safety system activated at the 100 MW Phase II building of the Moss Landing Energy Storage Facility in Moss Landing, California, operated by Vistra Energy. An investigation found that the water-based suppression system...
See what failed, why, and what it cost
The record behind each entry: the manufacturer, integrator and operator, root cause, failure mode, downtime, losses and every source.
In September 2022, a fire occurred in a single Tesla Megapack battery enclosure at the Elkhorn Battery Energy Storage System in Moss Landing, California, United States, owned and operated by Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E). The site held 256 Megapack units....
On 4 September 2021, the Moss Landing Energy Storage Facility in California, operated by Vistra Energy, experienced an overheating issue affecting a limited number of battery modules in its Phase I 300 MW/1200 MWh system. Local fire crews responded to a...
What this page is, and what it is not
It counts the records in this register that name this company in any role. Being named is not a finding of fault. Most incidents have several contributing causes, and the company named as manufacturer, integrator, operator or contractor is often not the cause of what went wrong.
Counts reflect what public reporting names, so a company with a large installed base, or one operating where reporting is open, will appear more often than a company of the same size elsewhere. Read the counts alongside the note on coverage in the methodology.
If you work for this company and something here is wrong, tell us and we will correct it. Use the corrections page: we acknowledge within 2 working days and decide within 10.