For insurers, brokers and lenders
Price, place and finance energy assets on what has actually failed.
Underwriters, brokers and project finance teams use the register to see how often battery, solar, wind, grid and data centre assets fail, how badly, what it cost, and which companies were involved, with the source behind every entry.
The Energy Incident Register is a data contributor to the PV Fire Intelligence Network (PV-FIN), led by BRE, and has been reported by DatacenterDynamics (DCD).
The register's own rule: every entry cites its sources, and a correction is free for anyone.
A cost and downtime estimate on every entry. Where a source states the loss, you see that figure; where it does not, the register models a range with a confidence rating, so every incident carries a number. How the estimates work. Each month the loss and downtime benchmarks set out days out of service and loss by technology, and the share of incidents past 30, 60 and 90 days.
Start today
Every full record: the parties named, the cause, the downtime and loss estimate, and the sources behind each value. Ask the register your own questions and get answers drawn from the records, with every incident linked.
Cancel at any time.
For insurers and reinsurers
Price the risk on evidence, not on the submission. A submission tells you what the broker chose to include. The register tells you what has been reported about that technology, that manufacturer and that integrator, anywhere in the world, with the source behind each one.
What has failed, and how badly
Counts and severity by technology, what failed most often, and the trend by year, computed live from every published entry.
Who was involved
The verified record names the site, operator, OEM and integrator, with capacity, age at incident, root cause, downtime and loss estimates.
Evidence for the file
Every record lists the fire service, regulator, court or press sources used to confirm it. Cite the register in a rating rationale with a stable link.
For brokers
Bring the underwriter real loss history, not a questionnaire. Markets are pricing your client's technology on what has failed elsewhere. If you know those incidents first, you can answer them in the submission instead of being asked about them after the quote.
Comparable incidents for a placement
Search by technology, country, year and category. Open the verified record for the ones that match the risk you are placing.
Benchmarks a market will accept
Counts and severity by technology with the sample behind each, and a portfolio comparison that sets a client's mix against the register's own.
Lessons to put in the proposal
Each entry carries numbered lessons learned, written for operators, that a client can act on before renewal.
For lenders and investors
Due diligence on the integrator, the OEM and the operator, from the incidents they were involved in. Project finance teams, infrastructure funds and their technical advisers check the parties on a term sheet against verified incidents, and size the risk of the technology they are financing.
Has this integrator or OEM had incidents
The verified-record tables rank OEMs and integrators by recorded incidents, with the entries behind each count.
What the exposure looks like
The portfolio model turns a pipeline's MW by technology into register-equivalent incidents over the coverage period, with a range and the severity split.
Sources a credit committee can check
Every record cites its sources. Request a verification pass on any entry and the register searches for more, then emails the outcome.
Covering, placing or financing a portfolio? Paste its schedule of sites into a portfolio safety record and see what the published record holds for each site, with sources, in one dated link. Free.
How the data is made. Public reports are found daily, drafted into the register's format, reviewed against fixed rules, and published as confirmed or provisional with the sources listed. Provisional entries are rechecked automatically. The verified record behind each entry is built from the same sources and approved only when the figures are supported. Methodology. Accuracy disclaimer. Plans and prices.