Corrections
Last updated 22 October 2026.
If something on the register is wrong, tell us. This page explains how, what we do, and how quickly.
1. How to edit an entry
- To edit an entry, subscribe, open the incident, press Suggest an edit and add your source. It goes straight to the editorial team.
- A company or organisation named in a record does not need to subscribe to check it. Email editor@energyincidentregister.com from an address at that organisation with the record reference, and we send the full record free, so you can ask for a correction or add your statement.
- For escalations, email editor@energyincidentregister.com with your evidence.
- Our editorial team looks at every suggestion alongside the sources.
With an escalation, give the record reference (for example EIR-0012) or the page address, what is wrong, what you believe is correct with your source, and whether you are connected to the incident. Being connected does not decide the outcome.
2. What happens next
- The editorial team checks the suggestion against the sources we hold and any you provide.
- Suggested edits are usually decided within 2 working days. Escalations are acknowledged within 2 working days and decided within 10, or we tell you why we need longer.
- You hear by email either way. Nothing changes on the register until the editorial team accepts it.
- If the record is wrong, we correct it and add the correction to the log below.
- If we do not agree the record is wrong, we tell you why and what evidence would change our view. You can ask for it to be looked at again with any new evidence, and it will be.
3. Requests to remove an entry
The register exists so the industry can learn. We remove entries only where they are shown to be false, where they breach the law, or where publication would cause a clear risk to safety or to an individual. Being an operator, owner or supplier named in a verified public record is not by itself a reason for removal. Anonymised entries do not identify anyone and are not removed on request from a party who believes they can identify themselves in one, though we will review the anonymisation.
4. Right of reply
A company or organisation named in a record may send a statement of up to 150 words. We attach any reasonable statement to the record, clearly marked as theirs, unless it is unlawful, names an individual or is about something other than the record. Where a named company disputes a cause, its position is shown beside the cause, not below it.
A statement does not change the record. The record follows the sources, and an official or court finding stays as it is unless new evidence shows it is wrong. Only the editorial team changes a record, and only on evidence.
5. Corrections log
10 September 2026. Four entries were corrected against primary sources after a check of the named companies on landmark incidents.
- EIR-0009: the September 2022 Megapack fire was at PG&E's Elkhorn Battery Energy Storage System, not the neighbouring Vistra facility. The operator, the cause statement and the record were corrected from PG&E's published findings. An unsupported return-to-service figure was removed.
- EIR-0011: eight firefighters and one police officer were taken to hospital and four firefighters were seriously injured, per the UL FSRI report; the entry had blurred the two. The cell supplier is now named as the sources name it, and the entry records that the supplier publicly disputed the root cause given in the report the operator commissioned.
- EIR-0012: the fire was not brought under control for three days, not six hours, and the site holds 212 units, per Energy Safe Victoria's statement of technical findings.
- EIR-0013: the EPA settlement was with LS Power, the owner, and nearly 15,000 batteries were involved, not several thousand.
No other corrections have been recorded since this page was created on 6 September 2026. Corrections are applied by a reviewed list with a source for every change, and the previous text is kept.