← Back to the list
Battery storageUnited StatesEIR-0009

Megapack fire at PG&E Elkhorn Battery, Moss Landing, California

2022Published 1 May 2026Responsible editor: Chief Editor

Estimated damageEstimated by the register's adjusterHow? Know the real figure?
Figure hidden: shown to subscribersMedium confidence
out of service for about •• daysShown in the record →Full estimate
From the recordRoot cause hiddenFailed part hiddenThe maker is named in 13 other entries (being named is not a finding of fault)
Where
Elkhorn Battery Energy Storage System, Moss Landing, California, United States
Operator
Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E)
What
Fire in a single Tesla Megapack battery enclosure
Injuries
None reported
Cause
Water entered due to improperly installed vent shield panels

Companies named in the reporting of this entry (being named is not a finding of fault): Pacific Gas and Electric, Tesla, Vistra Energy

In September 2022, a fire occurred in a single Tesla Megapack battery enclosure at the Elkhorn Battery Energy Storage System in Moss Landing, California, United States, owned and operated by Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E). The site held 256 Megapack units. The fire started in the early hours of the morning. Safety controls automatically disconnected the facility from the grid, as designed. Shelter in place advice was issued to nearby residents while the local fire service attended.

The fire was brought under control later the same day and remained confined to the single enclosure, without spreading to neighbouring units. No injuries were reported and there was no interruption to electricity supply to customers. The Elkhorn facility is separate from Vistra Energy's neighbouring Moss Landing Energy Storage Facility.

According to the findings published by PG&E, water entered the affected Megapack because its deflagration vent shield panels had been installed improperly, and that water intrusion led to the thermal event. The investigation found that 88 Megapacks on the site had experienced water intrusion from improperly installed vent shields. All 88 were inspected, damaged parts were replaced and the units were re-tested. PG&E and Tesla reported corrective actions covering the installation of the equipment, monitoring processes and additional automated features.

  1. Check all vent shield panels on Megapack units after installation, because improper fit allowed water to enter and cause a thermal event.
  2. Test that automatic grid disconnection works on safety trips for BESS sites, as it operated here and limited the outcome.
  3. Inspect all identical units when water intrusion is found in one Megapack, since 88 units on site had the same defect.

More lessons on maintenance, inspection and ageing assets, from every incident on the register.

  • Exact date in September 2022
  • Cost of inspection and repairs
  • Which monitoring changes were added

This entry is updated when these are reported. Get an alert for the next one like it.

Site page: Elkhorn Battery Energy Storage System (status, dates and other incidents)

Other entries that name Elkhorn

Published 2026-05-01. Written from public reporting. Descriptive, not investigative. See the data accuracy disclaimer.

See the register's stories first in Google: add it as a preferred source.

Chart to reuse with this story: Battery storage incidents in the United States, by year, free with a credit (PNG).

Battery storage incidents in the United States: 49 entries, with a free alert for the next one.

Battery storage fires: the counts, the latest entries and a free alert for the next one. Also: battery storage container fires.

Browse the full register or submit an incident.