Wind turbine blade breaks after undetected lightning damage
Apr 2026Published 26 Sept 2026Responsible editor: Chief Editor
- Where
- Oga City, Akita Prefecture
- What
- Wind turbine blade broke during operation
- Cause
- Lightning strike on 20 March damaged the blade
Get the next one by email
Free alerts on wind (onshore) incidents in Japan, and an email when EIR-1318 is updated. No account needed; unsubscribe in one click.
Confirm your email and every wind turbine incident on the register arrives at once as a spreadsheet (CSV), free.
Get a free sample brief Three complete verified records and the incidents-per-GW table, by email within a minute.
We will also email you about the register's paid records and plans, at most once a week and three times in all. You can stop these at any time. By signing up you agree to the privacy policy.
What happened
On 12 April a blade on a wind turbine in Oga City, Akita Prefecture, broke during operation. The operator reported to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry that a lightning strike on 20 March had damaged the blade. Continued running weakened the structure until it failed. An inspection on 4 April did not detect the damage because the turbine remained rotating during a ground-level visual check.
Contributing factors
Lightning damage reduced blade strength. The 4 April inspection was performed while the rotor was turning, so the fault was missed.
Lessons learned
- A ground level visual check cannot detect blade damage if the rotor keeps turning, so stop the turbine for all blade inspections after lightning.
- Lightning damage can weaken a blade enough to cause failure weeks later, so confirm no damage before return to service.
More lessons on weather and external hazards, from every incident on the register.
Not yet known
- Turbine model and age
- Downtime after the blade broke
- Cost of repair or replacement
This entry is updated when these are reported. Get an alert for the next one like it.
Source
Published 2026-09-26. Written from public reporting. Descriptive, not investigative. See the data accuracy disclaimer.