Fire damages battery storage system at solar plant in Samcheok
Dec 2018Published 7 Sept 2026Responsible editor: Chief Editor
- Where
- Solar plant in Samcheok, Gangwon Province, South Korea
- Manufacturer
- LG Chem
- What
- Fire destroyed lithium-ion battery units and damaged building
- Injuries
- None reported
- Cause
- Could not be determined
Get the next one by email
Free alerts on hybrid co-located incidents in South Korea, and an email when EIR-0155 is updated. No account needed; unsubscribe in one click.
Confirm your email and every battery storage incident on the register arrives at once as a spreadsheet (CSV), free.
Get a free sample brief Three complete verified records and the incidents-per-GW table, by email within a minute.
We will also email you about the register's paid records and plans, at most once a week and three times in all. You can stop these at any time. By signing up you agree to the privacy policy.
Companies named in the reporting of this entry (being named is not a finding of fault): LG Chem
What happened
In December 2018, a fire broke out during the evening at a battery energy storage system integrated with a solar generation facility in Samcheok, Gangwon Province, South Korea. The fire destroyed a large number of lithium-ion battery units and damaged part of the building housing the system, resulting in substantial property loss. No injuries were reported in the source. Fire services noted that lithium-ion battery fires of this type are difficult to extinguish, as contact with water can cause further heating and explosion risk.
The exact cause could not be determined, as the batteries were consumed so completely that investigators were unable to identify a point of origin. The facility had reportedly undergone a safety inspection earlier the same month under a national programme addressing battery storage fire risk. The incident occurred during a period of rapid growth in storage installations paired with renewable generation in the country.
Contributing factors
According to the source report, water damage to the batteries had been identified during a safety inspection before the fire, and the battery supplier, LG Chem, twice requested that the system be taken out of service. The report states that the system remained in service and that the batteries were returned to operating condition before the fire. The register has not independently verified these accounts and no formal cause was established.
Lessons learned
- A supplier notice of water damage to lithium-ion batteries must trigger an automatic operational hold until assessment is complete.
- Lithium-ion battery fires destroy physical evidence, so battery management and alarm data must be preserved off site for later review.
- Co-located storage and generation share a building, so fire separation and loss of the shared structure must be assessed together.
More lessons on detection and monitoring, spacing, layout and fire spread, from every incident on the register.
Not yet known
- Battery model and age
- Cost of the damage
- Duration of downtime
- Follow-up actions after the safety inspection
This entry is updated when these are reported. Get an alert for the next one like it.
Source
Published 2026-09-07. Written from public reporting. Descriptive, not investigative. See the data accuracy disclaimer.