Fujitsu data centre UPS failure cuts power to banks and cloud servers
June 2012Published 13 Oct 2026Responsible editor: Chief Editor
Get the next one by email
Free alerts on data centre incidents in Japan, and an email when EIR-2358 is updated. No account needed; unsubscribe in one click.
Get a free sample brief Three complete verified records and the incidents-per-GW table, by email within a minute.
By signing up you agree to the privacy policy.
Companies named in this entry: Fujitsu
What happened
On 7 June 2012 systems hosted at Fujitsu's Tatebayashi System Center in Japan stopped for long periods. All Tokyo Star Bank ATMs, some Resona Bank ATMs, all Sony Bank systems, some Nifty Cloud servers and Square Enix online games were affected. According to a Nifty Cloud report, cited by ScanNetSecurity, the failure of the centre's uninterruptible power supply (UPS) left about 7 per cent of servers without power. The centre had layered protection: a redundant UPS was to take over when a UPS failed, and if all UPS units stopped, power was to be supplied directly, bypassing the UPS.
The source says none of these measures worked. Nifty reported that the outage began at 5:59 and that a power supply unit in a data centre had failed. Nifty Cloud was provisionally restored at 19:40 the same day.
Contributing factors
The source says the redundant UPS and the direct bypass supply did not take over as designed. Further detail on why the layered protection failed was not available in the text reviewed.
Lessons learned
- Test automatic transfer to redundant UPS units and bypass supplies under real load, not only on paper.
- Verify that the failure of one UPS cannot disable the protection layers behind it.
- Map which customer systems share a single power domain, so that a partial power loss does not cascade into essential financial services.
More lessons on outages, backup supply and restoration, electrical protection and isolation, from every incident on the register.
Source
Published 2026-10-13. Written from public reporting. Descriptive, not investigative. See the data accuracy disclaimer.