← Back to the list
Grid infrastructureUnited StatesEIR-0019

Switchgear failure at a Rhode Island distribution substation after feeder fault

2022Published 1 May 2026Responsible editor: Chief Editor

Estimated damageEstimated by the register's adjusterHow? Know the real figure?
Figure hidden: shown to subscribersMedium confidence
supply cut for about •• daysShown in the record →Full estimate
From the recordRoot cause hiddenFailed part hidden
Where
Distribution substation in Rhode Island, United States
What
Switchgear failure after phase to phase feeder fault
Response
More than 50 personnel mobilised for restoration
Cause
Phase to phase fault from fallen tree on feeder
Outcome
Supply interrupted to 9,300 customers

In August 2022 a major equipment failure occurred at a distribution substation in Rhode Island, United States. The substation, commissioned in the early 1980s, had a single 115 kV to 13.8 kV load tap changing transformer supplying four 13.8 kV distribution feeders serving several communities and a neighbouring utility. The failure took all four distribution feeders offline and interrupted supply to approximately 9,300 customers, including a hospital and a mental health facility. The operator mobilised more than 50 personnel for restoration, deployed contracted emergency generation, replaced the failed switchgear and progressively restored customers. The state regulator carried out a formal investigation and published its findings.

According to the published investigation, the initiating event was a phase to phase fault on one distribution feeder caused by a fallen tree. The recloser on that feeder cleared the fault, but the fault persisted for longer than a bolted, low impedance fault would have done, because tree contact produces a higher impedance fault with lower fault current, for which protective relays are set to allow a longer clearing time. The investigation reported that the combination of fault duration and fault location placed significant stress on the upstream substation switchgear. Engineering guidance in use at the time recommended that bolted faults at the end of the protected zone be cleared in under one second, while explicitly allowing longer clearing times for higher impedance faults. The post incident analysis considered whether protection coordination at substations of this design vintage could be adjusted to reduce the stress imposed during such fault clearing events.

  1. Review protection coordination at older substations, since a higher impedance tree fault allowed longer clearing time than a bolted fault and stressed the switchgear.
  2. Include high impedance fault scenarios in protection studies at vintage substations, as tree contact produces lower fault current and extends clearing time.
  3. Plan restoration with contracted generation and customer switching when a single transformer substation loses all feeders.

More lessons on structural integrity and turbines, electrical protection and isolation, from every incident on the register.

  • Switchgear model and age
  • Exact duration of customer outages
  • Cost of the switchgear replacement

This entry is updated when these are reported. Get an alert for the next one like it.

Published 2026-05-01. Written from public reporting. Descriptive, not investigative. See the data accuracy disclaimer.

See the register's stories first in Google: add it as a preferred source.

Chart to reuse with this story: Grid infrastructure incidents in the United States, by year, free with a credit (PNG).

Grid infrastructure incidents in the United States: 415 entries, with a free alert for the next one.

Substation and transformer fires: the counts, the latest entries and a free alert for the next one. Also: switchgear and breaker fires.

Browse the full register or submit an incident.