Switchgear failure at a Rhode Island distribution substation after feeder fault
2022Published 1 May 2026Responsible editor: Chief Editor
- Where
- Distribution substation in Rhode Island, United States
- What
- Switchgear failure after phase to phase feeder fault
- Response
- More than 50 personnel mobilised for restoration
- Cause
- Phase to phase fault from fallen tree on feeder
- Outcome
- Supply interrupted to 9,300 customers
Get the next one by email
Free alerts on grid infrastructure incidents in the United States, and an email when EIR-0019 is updated. No account needed; unsubscribe in one click.
Confirm your email and every substation and transformer incident on the register arrives at once as a spreadsheet (CSV), free.
Get a free sample brief Three complete verified records and the incidents-per-GW table, by email within a minute.
We will also email you about the register's paid records and plans, at most once a week and three times in all. You can stop these at any time. By signing up you agree to the privacy policy.
What happened
In August 2022 a major equipment failure occurred at a distribution substation in Rhode Island, United States. The substation, commissioned in the early 1980s, had a single 115 kV to 13.8 kV load tap changing transformer supplying four 13.8 kV distribution feeders serving several communities and a neighbouring utility. The failure took all four distribution feeders offline and interrupted supply to approximately 9,300 customers, including a hospital and a mental health facility. The operator mobilised more than 50 personnel for restoration, deployed contracted emergency generation, replaced the failed switchgear and progressively restored customers. The state regulator carried out a formal investigation and published its findings.
Contributing factors
According to the published investigation, the initiating event was a phase to phase fault on one distribution feeder caused by a fallen tree. The recloser on that feeder cleared the fault, but the fault persisted for longer than a bolted, low impedance fault would have done, because tree contact produces a higher impedance fault with lower fault current, for which protective relays are set to allow a longer clearing time. The investigation reported that the combination of fault duration and fault location placed significant stress on the upstream substation switchgear. Engineering guidance in use at the time recommended that bolted faults at the end of the protected zone be cleared in under one second, while explicitly allowing longer clearing times for higher impedance faults. The post incident analysis considered whether protection coordination at substations of this design vintage could be adjusted to reduce the stress imposed during such fault clearing events.
Lessons learned
- Review protection coordination at older substations, since a higher impedance tree fault allowed longer clearing time than a bolted fault and stressed the switchgear.
- Include high impedance fault scenarios in protection studies at vintage substations, as tree contact produces lower fault current and extends clearing time.
- Plan restoration with contracted generation and customer switching when a single transformer substation loses all feeders.
More lessons on structural integrity and turbines, electrical protection and isolation, from every incident on the register.
Not yet known
- Switchgear model and age
- Exact duration of customer outages
- Cost of the switchgear replacement
This entry is updated when these are reported. Get an alert for the next one like it.
Source
Published 2026-05-01. Written from public reporting. Descriptive, not investigative. See the data accuracy disclaimer.