Battery storage container destroyed by fire during commissioning at Perles-et-Castelet substation
Dec 2020Published 7 Sept 2026Responsible editor: Chief Editor
- Where
- Perles-et-Castelet RTE substation, Ariège, France
- Operator
- RTE
- What
- Battery storage container fire during commissioning
- Cause
- Battery rack discharged into adjacent rack after insulation fault
- Outcome
- Storage container destroyed
Get the next one by email
Free alerts on battery storage incidents in France, and an email when EIR-0142 is updated. No account needed; unsubscribe in one click.
Confirm your email and every battery storage incident on the register arrives at once as a spreadsheet (CSV), free.
Get a free sample brief Three complete verified records and the incidents-per-GW table, by email within a minute.
We will also email you about the register's paid records and plans, at most once a week and three times in all. You can stop these at any time. By signing up you agree to the privacy policy.
Companies named in the reporting of this entry (being named is not a finding of fault): Ingeteam
What happened
During acceptance testing of a newly installed hybrid battery and supercapacitor storage unit at the Perles-et-Castelet RTE transformer substation in Perles-et-Castelet, Ariège, France, operated and owned by RTE, with the storage system supplied by Ingeteam as manufacturer and integrator, temperature and smoke alarms activated shortly after the equipment was energised. Personnel evacuated the control room as smoke emerged from one of two stacked containers. Around 45 minutes later, an overpressure event blew open the container doors and a fire broke out, ultimately destroying the storage container despite an extended firefighting response.
Investigation established that one battery rack suddenly discharged into an adjacent rack, with the resulting current flowing only through part of the second rack. Insulation resistance in the first rack had fallen close to short-circuit levels. Investigators proposed that a failed electrical connection contacting the rack's metal frame, combined with an insulation fault on a busbar linking a module to its protection unit, may have caused an electric arc upstream of a fuse.
Contributing factors
Investigators identified a probable insulation fault at electrical connections passing through the battery rack support frame, potentially combined with a failed electrical connection contacting the metal frame, which may have produced an electric arc not cleared by the fuse protection. The precise root cause of the insulation fault itself could not be determined.
Lessons learned
- Battery rack insulation resistance must be monitored continuously at module level, as a sudden drop to short-circuit levels allowed rack-to-rack discharge.
- Electrical connections through metal rack frames require extra design checks and inspection, since a fault here produced an arc that fuses did not clear.
- Fire protection and isolation plans for BESS during commissioning must allow for rapid energy isolation, as the container was destroyed despite extended firefighting.
More lessons on detection and monitoring, electrical protection and isolation, fire suppression and firefighting, from every incident on the register.
Not yet known
- Battery and supercapacitor system model and age
- Duration of site downtime
- Cost of the damage and replacement
This entry is updated when these are reported. Get an alert for the next one like it.
Source
Published 2026-09-07. Written from public reporting. Descriptive, not investigative. See the data accuracy disclaimer.