Blade failure at Vineyard Wind 1 offshore wind project, Massachusetts

In July 2024, a recently installed turbine at the Vineyard Wind 1 offshore wind project, located south of Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket, Massachusetts, United States, suffered a blade failure during early testing. The turbine had been running for about six hours when a high vibration alarm on one blade triggered an automatic shutdown. Around an hour later an aerial inspection found that one of the blades, roughly 107 metres long, had broken about 20 metres from the root, with the remainder of the blade hanging from the hub. Fibreglass and foam fragments were dispersed into the sea and washed onto nearby beaches over the following days, attracting substantial media coverage. The offshore regulator required the ten turbines then operating at the project, operated and owned by Vineyard Wind, to be taken offline, halting generation, and construction work was also stopped. The machine was of a 13 MW class design manufactured by GE Vernova, among the largest then in commercial offshore service. No injuries were reported.

As stated by GE Vernova, the turbine manufacturer, in a public investor call eleven days after the event, preliminary investigation identified a manufacturing deviation at one of its blade factories, described as insufficient bonding that the company's quality assurance process had not detected before the blade left the plant. The manufacturer said it would re-inspect all 150 blades produced at that plant, including blades already installed at offshore projects, using non-destructive methods including radiographic inspection. Public reporting stated that this fault was characterised as distinct from a separate blade incident at another offshore project earlier in 2024, which had been attributed to an installation error. The regulator's investigation was continuing at the time of reporting.

Drawn from the manufacturer's public disclosure and the observed response:

1. treat bond line quality on large composite blades as a critical-to-safety characteristic, with hold points and documented sign-off that a deviation cannot pass without detection;
2. verify that factory quality assurance methods, including non-destructive testing coverage, have been re-validated for current blade lengths rather than carried over from smaller earlier designs;
3. where a defect is attributed to production, define in advance the basis for a fleet-wide response, for example inspecting all blades from the same plant, production period or process, using radiographic or ultrasonic methods;
4. hold traceability records that allow blades to be linked to factory, mould and production batch, so that an affected population can be identified quickly;
5. prepare an incident communications plan for offshore assets covering early factual updates to regulators, coastal authorities and the public, since silence in the first days allows unverified accounts to take hold;
6. include marine and shoreline debris recovery in emergency response planning, as environmental clean-up, regulator-imposed work stoppages and loss of generation can extend the consequences far beyond the technical failure;
7. operators of blades from the same design or production route can commission their own inspections ahead of any manufacturer campaign rather than waiting for one.

nenc.news/2024-07-24/company-that-made-failed-vineyard-wind-blade-...