← Back to the list
Battery storageUnited StatesEIR-0655

Battery Storage Fire and Fume Release at Two Warwick, New York Sites

June 2023Published 11 Sept 2026Responsible editor: Chief Editor

Estimated damageEstimated by the register's adjusterHow? Know the real figure?
Figure hidden: shown to subscribersMedium confidence
out of service for about •• daysShown in the record →Full estimate
From the recordRoot cause hiddenFailed part hiddenThe maker is named in 4 other entries (being named is not a finding of fault)
Where
Two sites in Warwick, New York
Manufacturer
Powin
What
Fire at County Route 1 site and fumes at Church Street Extension
Cause
Under investigation
Outcome
Batteries removed at Church Street site after packaging

Companies named in the reporting of this entry (being named is not a finding of fault): Convergent Energy and Power, Powin

Two lithium-ion battery energy storage sites in Warwick, New York experienced separate incidents within about 24 hours of each other during a storm. A fire broke out at a storage site on County Route 1 that burned for several days, while a second site on Church Street Extension emitted fumes that worried nearby residents. Hazmat crews carried out around 20 hours of air metering over three days and reported no elevated levels of battery-related chemicals.

The school district also tested surfaces in buses and classrooms and found no harmful residue. Batteries at the Church Street site were packaged and removed for disposal, while the batteries at the County Route 1 site were left in place after cooling to assist investigation. Convergent Energy and Power, the integrator, and Powin, the battery manufacturer, said they had staff on site working with local fire officials to determine the cause.

A large storm affected both sites around the time of the failures. Both sites used a newly deployed battery system model that had been in service for only a short period before the incident.

  1. A newly deployed battery system model requires close monitoring in its first months, as both sites used one that had been in service only a short period.
  2. Storm events near new battery assets call for rapid response, as a large storm affected both sites around the time of the failures.
  3. Independent air and surface testing after a fume event helps confirm no spread, as hazmat crews found no elevated levels and school tests found no residue.

More lessons on detection and monitoring, weather and external hazards, spacing, layout and fire spread, from every incident on the register.

  • Exact cause of each incident
  • Battery model and service age
  • Downtime and repair cost
  • Who operates the sites

This entry is updated when these are reported. Get an alert for the next one like it.

Published 2026-09-11. Written from public reporting. Descriptive, not investigative. See the data accuracy disclaimer.

See the register's stories first in Google: add it as a preferred source.

Chart to reuse with this story: Battery storage incidents in the United States, by year, free with a credit (PNG).

Battery storage incidents in the United States: 52 entries, with a free alert for the next one.

Battery storage fires: the counts, the latest entries and a free alert for the next one.

Browse the full register or submit an incident.